Re: Nanobots Not Needed
From: sam kayley (thesardinedeepervoid_at_btgoldfishinternet.com)
Date: 03/07/05
- Previous message: Jim Logajan: "Re: Nanobots Not Needed"
- In reply to: John S. Novak, III: "Re: Nanobots Not Needed"
- Next in thread: Chris Phoenix: "Re: Nanobots Not Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 03:51:39 -0000
"John S. Novak, III" <jsn@panix.com> wrote in message
news:112k1degnbuo7d3@news.supernews.com...
....
> I am obligated to snort and chuckle. Resources are not infinitie,
> even with molecular assembly. I see no decoupling from the global
> economy in the near future, nor do I see it as desireable, unless one
> uses the technology to leave the globe.
....
Wherever the resources for self-sufficient farming are available, the
resources for self-sustaining nanotech that doesn't need a gardener, tools
that can't be made onsite, nitrogen salts, or much water are also available,
the only ongoing inputs from the global 'economy' being new information
where upgrades are desired.
- Previous message: Jim Logajan: "Re: Nanobots Not Needed"
- In reply to: John S. Novak, III: "Re: Nanobots Not Needed"
- Next in thread: Chris Phoenix: "Re: Nanobots Not Needed"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|