Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- From: ed ehrat <lambdamax01@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:58:05 -0000
Steve, I'm afraid that is a little too vague. The "control processes" allows
the current conundrum. I consider the "classic nanotechnology" as the specific
manipulation of nanoscale materials and/or processes using nanoprecise
mechanics. The vexatious nature involves the level of control; whether that
control is haphazard or precise and specific at the nanoscale.
steve@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
"The application of nanoscience in order to control processes on the
nanometer scale, i.e. between 0.1 nm and 100 nm."
http://www.nanoword.net/library/defgen/generate.php?termid=58
Steve Lenhert
http://www.nanoword.net
_______________________________________________
sci.nanotech mailing list
sci.nanotech@xxxxxxxxxxxx
http://venusia.golgothe.net/mailman/listinfo/sci.nanotech
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Shopping
Find Great Deals on Holiday Gifts at Yahoo! Shopping
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- From: steve
- Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- Prev by Date: Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- Next by Date: Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- Previous by thread: Nanotechnology Redefined
- Next by thread: Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- Index(es):
Loading