Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 03:17:38 -0000
"Oliver 'Ojo' Bedford" <newsojo@xxxxxx> writes:
>> The glossary of "Nanosystems", a book too many people haven't read,
>> says:
>
> Me too. So what?
If you haven't read "Nanosystems", you aren't in a position to discuss
nanotechnology, at least as the term was originally intended.
>> "[...]As introduced by the author, a technology based on the ability
>> to build structures to complex, atomic specifications by means of
>> mechanosynthesis[...]"
>
> Which leads us to the next question: what is mechanosynthesis?
> Organic and inorganic synthesis are classic disciplines of chemistry and
> the term mechanochemistry was coined in 1919 by Wilhelm Ostwald.
That particular fact is discussed at length in "Nanosystems". You
might want to read the book.
Perry
.
- References:
- Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- From: ed ehrat
- Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- From: steve
- Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- From: Perry E. Metzger
- Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- From: Oliver 'Ojo' Bedford
- Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- Prev by Date: Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- Next by Date: Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- Previous by thread: Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- Next by thread: Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nanotechnology Redefined
- Index(es):
Loading