Re: Best Programming language for AI in Nanobots


rhooker123@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
But I imagine the nano revolution involving going to a lake full of
toxic chemicals and introducing a few thousand nanobots which replicate
themselves until they have enough to do the job, of build little units
that can do the job, or take pill which lets thousands of nanobots
which turn in to billions to bind to every cancer cell in your body.

For the toxic waste cleanup, you can produce trillions of nanobots in a
factory and dump them into the lake - they don't need the ability to
replicate in the lake. For the cancer treatment, the pill can contain a
few billion ready-made nanobots - they don't need the ability to
replicate in the human body, any more than a car needs to double as a
car factory. Omitting the ability to replicate on-site not only
eliminates a potential safety issue, but also makes the development
effort vastly easier and cheaper, so there's absolutely no reason to
include it.

--
"Always look on the bright side of life."
To reply by email, replace no.spam with my last name.

.