Re: Best Programming language for AI in Nanobots
- From: rhooker123@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 02:37:51 -0000
Well there are certain advantages to building faster. For example you
may want to experiment with particular configurations which are beyond
your best computers ability to understand, so you make trillions of
bots, most are failures, die, and they are recycled in producing new
bots which altered designs until they get it right.
They evolve but at a pace of millions of years in a few weeks, risky
but I imagine some safe way to control it oculd be found.
Also if you want to explore space, you go out to the massive gas giants
to produce swarms of explorer bots that can come much closer to the
speed of light than we can, you have the mass material wealth of the
gian systems like Saturn or Jupiter to work with. Trillions and
trillions of bots, to be spread out in all directions at hight speeds
to find a rock somewhere and start building small explorer units.
This is the vision for the ultimate nano-tech for me, man moving his
civilization and knowledge out in to the Universe in tiny little ships
able to self reproduce and build after a journey of thousands of years
moving at 80% of the speed of light.
.
- References:
- Re: Best Programming language for AI in Nanobots
- From: Phillip Huggan
- Re: Best Programming language for AI in Nanobots
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: Best Programming language for AI in Nanobots
- Prev by Date: Re: Nanobot dangers - pollution
- Next by Date: Postdoc positions in Nanotechnology
- Previous by thread: Re: Best Programming language for AI in Nanobots
- Next by thread: Re: Error in Allis and Drexler paper
- Index(es):
Loading