Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Nano Morality
- From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 30 Apr 2006 17:38:45 -0000
rhooker123@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
These points, though good, are rather common ideas on evolutoin, and
they are entirely valid.
My point is something a little different. Species survive no
individuals.
Actually, it is not a "species" that survives, but particular
genes. If an individual thrives, his genes are passed on and
survive. If he does not, they do not. Evolution takes place on the
level of individuals, not species.
A human needs is a unique animal that needs
the presence of other in order to survive, and they need the species
to produce sexual partners.
This is not "unique", this is the case with most of the creatures on
the planet.
I remind you that the greatest alturism is felt for a lover, who likely
will be very distant genetically.
Actually, the greatest protection we extend is generally towards our
own children, and for obvious reasons. Protection we extend towards
mates does, of course, make evolutionary sense given that we need
their assistance to raise those children.
--
Perry E. Metzger perry@xxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Nano Morality
- From: rhooker123
- Re: Nano Morality
- From: Danny at Chrastina dot net
- Re: Nano Morality
- From: rhooker123
- Nano Morality
- Prev by Date: Re: Nano Morality
- Previous by thread: Re: Nano Morality
- Next by thread: Re: Nano Morality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading