Re: [Sci.nanotech] Quantum dot toxicity


Don't get me wrong: I not only have a scientific mind, but also a good
grip on the English language. And yes, I asked for an opinion. I do
think that there is an answer: they are or they aren't toxic (for any
one type of quantum dot, under those particular experimental
parameters). That said, when studies don't delve into the matter
sufficiently, or if the results are inconsistent (and they are), that
doesn't negate having an opinion on the matter. People can even have an
opinion that will later be shown to be wrong. What I was hoping to do
was to stimulate some debate, based on references to experimental data
of course, on the subject.

Thanks for your input. And I think you are right: quantum dots are a
class of materials with different compositions, sizes, surface
modifications, etc, and can't be classified as one thing with a single
set of properties. This is a matter all to often overlooked in even
peer reviewed publications.

Perry E. Metzger wrote:
"Dominique" <dominique.mcmahon@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
Do you think quantum dots are toxic? Do you think evidence supports
their use in humans for diagnostics in the near future? What do you
think the main risks are?

I'm always surprised at people who start discussions like this.

The question of whether a particular chemical substance is toxic or
not is not a subject for opinion. It is something that has an answer,
and that answer is most easily determined by objective scientific
study.

Incidently, there isn't just once arrangement of atoms called a
"quantum dot" so there will not be one answer for the entire class of
objects called "quantum dots".

If you want to know the answer to your question for a particular type
of quantum dot, then the thing to do, if there is nothing yet in the
literature, is acquire experimental animals and perform a controlled
study.

Furthermore, if you have information/opinions on environmental release
or occupational hazards, I'd love to hear about it.

Again, this isn't a proper subject for "opinion". Hazards, if any, can
be determined with objective research.

Perry


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: [Sci.nanotech] Quantum dot toxicity
    ... think the main risks are? ... of quantum dot, then the thing to do, if there is nothing yet in the ... or occupational hazards, I'd love to hear about it. ... this isn't a proper subject for "opinion". ...
    (sci.nanotech)
  • Re: Mark Probert - Do you have PERSONAL reason why you dont want ??????this group discussing the
    ... If your opinion is that the sky is green, then you are holding an opinion ... :> The color of the sky is not a matter of opinion; it is a matter of fact. ... of acupuncture on this newsgroup has told us that it is not possible ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Lesson: Opinion vs. Fact
    ... source, and some water. ... Here's an example of an opinion: ... Two people can have conflicting opinions about a matter ... they'll agree when all of the evidence is in, there remains a fact of the ...
    (rec.music.classical.recordings)
  • Re: My thoughts on the Terry Schiavo case
    ... Jay, we often disagree, though I respect your opinions, but this message is ... > but I have a real problem with the vast amounts of money that are spent to ... "I want to be kept alive no matter how much it costs and no ... there is no cause for federal intervention, in my opinion. ...
    (sci.med.transcription)
  • Re: CFD: XMLification of NOTES
    ... > Your opinion does not matter. ... blame for misconfigured kernels from the end-user to the developer. ... mailing lists to keep track of changes. ...
    (freebsd-arch)