Re: nanotech programming languages?
- From: "The Sandwich King" <the.sandwich.king@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 07 Nov 2006 00:30:01 -0000
Gordon Copestake wrote:
In order to control nanotech in the future assemblers must be programed
with instructions in order to complete their work. Given the vast
amount of data involved it can be assumed that the "machine code" of
the assemblers will come from some sort of higher level programming
language which describes the desired outcome in a more concise and
human(?) readable format. I also assume that there are currently no
existing languages which will accomplish the task? What efforts have
been made using current technology to create a language that will
describe the tasks that assemblers will be required to perform and do
they resemble any current languages? Perhaps there will be no need for
such a programming language if human level AI's are built and we can
maybe then use plain English? What are peoples thoughts in this
direction?
We need a network for the assemblers to communicate with. Imagine
hundreds of trillions of assemblers, perhaps many times that, each with
a computer more powerful than the one you are using to read this
message, all working together to build a single structure the size of a
large office building.
How will we manage all of this activity?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: nanotech programming languages?
- From: Rory McLean
- Re: nanotech programming languages?
- Prev by Date: Call for papers: Nanotechnology for Medical and Surgical Applications
- Next by Date: Computer Animation (if you had link problems, here are new ones)
- Previous by thread: Re: nanotech programming languages?
- Next by thread: Re: nanotech programming languages?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading