Re: Who's still reading this group?

From: mike <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 00:02:27 -0000

On a dark an' dismal Tue, 18 Sep 2007 20:01:11 -0000, in flickering
lamplight, Jim Logajan <JamesL@xxxxxxxxx> scribed with phoenix qill :

Hello all,

Traffic on this group sure has slowed over the years. It's hard to tell who
is still lurking and who has been taken from us mere mortals by early onset
of technological singularity. ;-)

So please raise your hand if you are still reading this group.

Okay - that was nice - now if you could please post that you raised your
hand it'd be easier to see how many potential posters and lurkers are still
out there. :-)

Sorry, can't, oneliners are not permitted. :-p

.

References:
- Who's still reading this group?
  - From: Jim Logajan

Prev by Date: Re: [Sci.nanotech] Sound absorption properties of nanotube.
Next by Date: Re: [Sci.nanotech] Sound absorption properties of nanotube.
Previous by thread: Re: [Sci.nanotech] Re: Who's still reading this group?
Next by thread: Re: Who's still reading this group?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Whos still reading this group?
... In article, Jim Logajan ... is still lurking and who has been taken from us mere mortals by early onset ... So please raise your hand if you are still reading this group. ... Okay - that was nice - now if you could please post that you raised your ...
(sci.nanotech)
Re: Flaws in Drexlers vision
... lamplight, Tim Tyler ... scribed with phoenix qill: ... language to morph NT 4.0 into 5.0 is exactly equivalent=20 ...
(sci.nanotech)
Re: Whos still reading this group?
... Jim Logajan writes: ... is still lurking and who has been taken from us mere mortals by early onset ... Okay - that was nice - now if you could please post that you raised your ... hand it'd be easier to see how many potential posters and lurkers are still ...
(sci.nanotech)