Re: Who's still reading this group?
- From: Rory McLean <rory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 20:52:56 -0000
In article <13f0bk764gf1f7e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jim Logajan
<URL:mailto:JamesL@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello all,
Traffic on this group sure has slowed over the years. It's hard to tell who
is still lurking and who has been taken from us mere mortals by early onset
of technological singularity. ;-)
So please raise your hand if you are still reading this group.
Okay - that was nice - now if you could please post that you raised your
hand it'd be easier to see how many potential posters and lurkers are still
out there. :-)
I've been tied-up with other things, but I'm still keeping an eye
on this group.
This is something speculative that I've been mulling-over, but I
feel it needs a bit more thought first.
--
Rory McLean
rory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- References:
- Who's still reading this group?
- From: Jim Logajan
- Who's still reading this group?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Sci.nanotech] Sound absorption properties of nanotube.
- Next by Date: Re: Who's still reading this group?
- Previous by thread: Re: Who's still reading this group?
- Next by thread: Re: Who's still reading this group?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
