Re: Who's still reading this group?


On Sep 18, 3:01 pm, Jim Logajan <Jam...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello all,

Traffic on this group sure has slowed over the years. It's hard to tell who
is still lurking and who has been taken from us mere mortals by early onset
of technological singularity. ;-)

So please raise your hand if you are still reading this group.

Okay - that was nice - now if you could please post that you raised your
hand it'd be easier to see how many potential posters and lurkers are still
out there. :-)

<raises hand>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Whos still reading this group?
    ... is still lurking and who has been taken from us mere mortals by early ... hand it'd be easier to see how many potential posters and lurkers are ...
    (sci.nanotech)
  • Whos still reading this group?
    ... is still lurking and who has been taken from us mere mortals by early onset ... hand it'd be easier to see how many potential posters and lurkers are still ...
    (sci.nanotech)
  • Re: OT: Thanx & Medical Happy Dance
    ... It's so nice to hear that reading the messages has given you smiles - and whatever else! ... Just shows that lurking can be good - and we have no idea how many lurkers there might be. ... Heather in West Oz ...
    (rec.crafts.textiles.quilting)
  • Re: Challenger "Stealth Hire"
    ... Left it too late for my Mrs to go liveaboard but enjoy ... They could then return to lurking only, having not invalidated their lurking status. ... The Save Our Waterways campaign grew primarily from this ng and, as such, it would be useful to be able to claim some what more than this month's 370+ users. ... When talking on behalf of SOW I have always said that we probably had between 1-2000 regulars; I'm encouraged that we might have as many as 5,000 if we include lurkers. ...
    (uk.rec.waterways)
  • Re: layers
    ... standard practice here (more than lurking, I fear) ... There are a *lot* of lurkers. ... London police has ...
    (alt.html)
Loading