Re: Flaws in Drexler's vision


mike wrote:
Tim Tyler:

While we are on the subject, there doesn't
seem to have been much discussion of:

http://www.geniebusters.org/00_contents.htm

...here since 2001.

[...]

Is it actually worth plowing through?
Or am i just too thick to comprehend it?

I still have not seen much coherent criticism of
Drexler-style nanotech. I can see plenty of
rather incoherent criticism - e.g.:

http://www.amazon.com/Nanocosm-Nanotechnology-Changes-Coming-Inconceivably/dp/0814471811

....and about 90% of the site I mentioned above :-|

Am I missing something here?

Do people in the field still swallow Drexler's visions
of tiny scaled-down factories working in vacuum conditions
assembling structures an atom-at-a-time - as though they
were pixels on a CRT?
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@xxxxxxxxxxx Remove lock to reply.

.