Re: The Nanotech Rapture
- From: Tim Tyler <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 18:08:53 -0500
Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote:
That being said some news does creep out like the technology roadmap
http://e-drexler.com/p/07/00/1204TechnologyRoadmap.html and the project
behind it which does show that there are a lot of people nibbling away at
the problem and making progress too.
It reads more like a wishlist than a roadmap. Not putting dates on
anything
results in a rather tame kind of futurism which nobody can ever
disprove.
And where is AI? My coarse-scale nanosystem roadmap looks like:
Today -> AI -> Nanotechnology.
How can you have a nanotechnology roadmap without mentioning AI?
Surely that is the single most important enabling technology.
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@xxxxxxxxxxx Remove lock to
reply.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Nanotech Rapture
- From: Jim Logajan
- Re: The Nanotech Rapture
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith
- Re: The Nanotech Rapture
- References:
- The Nanotech Rapture
- From: Tim Tyler
- Re: The Nanotech Rapture
- From: Steve O'Hara-Smith
- The Nanotech Rapture
- Prev by Date: Re: The Nanotech Rapture
- Next by Date: Re: 20 year anniversary of sci.nanotech
- Previous by thread: Re: The Nanotech Rapture
- Next by thread: Re: The Nanotech Rapture
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|