Re: reprap
- From: Tim Tyler <seemysig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2009 11:44:59 -0500
William R. Cousert wrote:
Couldn't today's version print out a slightly better version, which in turn
would print out an even better version, repeating the process until we have
something that can print IC's?
The proof-of-concept of self-replication that we have works along
radically different lines.
The current plan seems to be not to copy itself, but to copy its
parts - in a way that allows them to be relatively easily assembled
by a human.
It would be surprising if a machine could print out better versions
of itself. Where would the information that allowed the improvements
come from? It happens in biology - but *very* slowly. You can't
just say "like this but smaller" - things change as you get smaller.
It seems as though you would need some extra R & D as well.
--
__________
|im |yler http://timtyler.org/ tim@xxxxxxxxxxx Remove lock to reply.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: reprap
- From: William R. Cousert
- Re: reprap
- From: Ahem A Rivet's Shot
- Re: reprap
- References:
- Re: reprap
- From: Perry E. Metzger
- Re: reprap
- From: William R. Cousert
- Re: reprap
- Prev by Date: Re: Any recent surveys of molecular nanotechnology?
- Next by Date: Re: reprap
- Previous by thread: Re: reprap
- Next by thread: Re: reprap
- Index(es):