Re: heavy trolling
From: Lee Rudolph (lrudolph_at_panix.com)
Date: 07/21/04
- Next message: Roger L. Bagula: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Previous message: Jochen Fromm: "Re: heavy trolling"
- In reply to: Jochen Fromm: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Next in thread: Roger L. Bagula: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Reply: Roger L. Bagula: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Jul 2004 16:52:06 -0400
"Jochen Fromm" <Jochen.Fromm@t-online.de> writes:
>I must apologize for the doping charge. You are right,
>it was intended to incite controversy - the behavior
>of an internet troll. But I am not a good troll, an ideal
>troll creates a heated discussion, see
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
...
>Although often your posts could come from an unrecognized
>genius
You're *sure* you're not a good troll?
I mean, some of the best trolling I've ever seen consisted
in nothing more than the bland assertion of a patent absurdity.
Lee Rudolph
- Next message: Roger L. Bagula: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Previous message: Jochen Fromm: "Re: heavy trolling"
- In reply to: Jochen Fromm: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Next in thread: Roger L. Bagula: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Reply: Roger L. Bagula: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|