Re: heavy trolling
From: Roger L. Bagula (rlbtftn_at_netscape.net)
Date: 07/21/04
- Next message: Rich: "Re: [Fwd: Two questions in Complex Analysis]"
- Previous message: Roger L. Bagula: "Re: heavy trolling"
- In reply to: Lee Rudolph: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Next in thread: Kevin S. Wilson: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Reply: Kevin S. Wilson: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 22:06:01 GMT
You have been a real fool at times haven't you?
I realize you are very well educated and intelligent,
but you just make yourself look so damned bad at times.
I've thought of including you with the other self destructive flame
producers, but
you sometimes actually answer questions right.
That's a virtue I like.
Lee Rudolph wrote:
> "Jochen Fromm" <Jochen.Fromm@t-online.de> writes:
>
>
>>I must apologize for the doping charge. You are right,
>>it was intended to incite controversy - the behavior
>>of an internet troll. But I am not a good troll, an ideal
>>troll creates a heated discussion, see
>>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
>
> ...
>
>>Although often your posts could come from an unrecognized
>>genius
>
>
> You're *sure* you're not a good troll?
>
> I mean, some of the best trolling I've ever seen consisted
> in nothing more than the bland assertion of a patent absurdity.
>
> Lee Rudolph
-- Respectfully, Roger L. Bagula tftn@earthlink.net, 11759Waterhill Road, Lakeside,Ca 92040-2905,tel: 619-5610814 : URL : http://home.earthlink.net/~tftn URL : http://victorian.fortunecity.com/carmelita/435/
- Next message: Rich: "Re: [Fwd: Two questions in Complex Analysis]"
- Previous message: Roger L. Bagula: "Re: heavy trolling"
- In reply to: Lee Rudolph: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Next in thread: Kevin S. Wilson: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Reply: Kevin S. Wilson: "Re: heavy trolling"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
