Re: Attractor set representation

From: Chris Zanek (chris_znk_at_yahoo.com)
Date: 09/22/04 

Date: 21 Sep 2004 17:50:44 -0700

aptsolutions@mindspring.com (Jeffrey H) wrote in message news:<41507b2d.7529075@news.east.earthlink.net>...
> f4 = 2f2 + f6 + k is consistent because for t+1,
> f4(t) + f5(t) = 2f2(t) + 2f6(t) + f5(t) - f6(t) + k
> This immediately removes one variable, and if we
> remove f6 we have
>
> f2(t + 1) = -f2(t) + f4(t) - k
> f4(t + 1) = f4(t) + f5(t)
> f5(t + 1) = f2(t) * f4(t)

Can you show in detail how you transformed the system of equations?

Thank you
Chris