Re: Nonlinear term in the NLS
From: Alwyn C. Scott (rover_at_theriver.com)
Date: 10/15/04
- Previous message: Ilusha: "Re: Nonlinear term in the NLS"
- In reply to: Ilusha: "Re: Nonlinear term in the NLS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 14 Oct 2004 18:45:42 -0700
Dear Ilusha,
Considering the solution
U(x,t) = A exp(ikx – iwt)
to have a finite amplitude, the dispersion equation is
w = k^2 – A^2
This means that for |k| < |A| the group velocity (dw/dk) is in the
opposite direction as the phase velocity (w/k), which leads to
instability.
If you send me your email address, I'll send you a pdf file with more
details.
Al
rover@theriver.com
===
===
"Ilusha" <eshliz@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<ckm0lm$do4$1@news.iucc.ac.il>...
> Dear Prof. Alwyn Scott,
>
> Thank you for your answer, the valuable information and references.
> I am familiar with the "Benjamin-Feir" stability of the SIS solution
> of the focusing/defocusing NLS. However, I still cannot
> understand what is the effect of nonlinearity and how it
> balances dispersion.
>
> As I understand, to show the effect of dispersion we consider the linearized
> equation:
>
> iUt + Uxx = 0
>
> Then the solution can be expressed as a traveling wave solution:
>
> U = Aexp( i(kx-wt) )
>
> We submit the solution into the linearized equation and get the dispersion
> relation:
>
>
> w = |k|^2
>
> >From which we induce the group velocity:
>
> Vg = dw/dk = 2k
>
> Which means that each Fourier component travels with different speed - the
> effect of
> dispersion.
>
>
> But how can I show the effect of nonlinearity? I thought to consider the
> dispersionless equation
>
> iUt - |U|U^2 = 0
>
> And show somehow that the components of the solution also travel with
> different
> speed.... Such that
>
> the dispersion can be balanced....
>
> Also, why in the defocusing case the balance will happen only when there is
> a "dark"
> soliton
>
> (as I understand: negative amplitude of the bright soliton)?
>
> Thank you very much for your help,I"Alwyn C. Scott" <rover@theriver.com>
> wrote in message news:35fc3b08.0410101106.11f78659@posting.google.com...
> > eli@gteko-dot-com.no-spam.invalid (Ilusha) wrote in message
> news:<41682d9a$1_2@127.0.0.1>...
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > How can I show for a nonlinear schrodinger equation that the
> > > nonlinearity
> > > term leads to the concentration of a wave (in contrast to
> > > dispersion).
> > >
> > > I know that I should start by dropping the dispersion term....
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > I
> >
> > ===
> > ===
> >
> > Dear I,
> >
> > Consider the NLS equation in the form
> >
> > iUt + Uxx + s|U|^2U = 0,
> >
> > where s is either +1 or -1.
> >
> > For either value of s, this equation evidently has a space-independent
> > solution (SIS) of the form
> >
> > U = A exp(i s A^2 t),
> >
> > where A is a real constant.
> >
> > If s = -1, this SIS is stable. If s = +1, the SIS is unstable to the
> > formation of solitons.
> >
> > This instability was first noticed in the context of nonlinear optics
> > by Ostrovosky and shortly thereafter in the context of water waves by
> > Benjamin and Feir. In the US and Europe, it is usually called the
> > "Benjamin-Feir insatability".
> >
> > L.A. Ostrovsky. Propagation of wave packets and space-time
> > self-focusing in a nonlinear medium. Soviet physics JETP 24 (1967)
> > 797-800.
> >
> > T. Brooke Benjamin and J.E. Feir. The disintegration of wave trains in
> > deep water. J. Fluid Mechanics 27 (1967) 417-430.
> >
> > See my recent book Nonlinear Science: Emergence and Dynamics of
> > Coherent Structures (2nd edition, 2003) at
> > http://www.oup.co.uk/isbn/0-19-852852-3 for additional details.
> >
> > Alwyn Scott
> > http://personal.riverusers.com/~rover
- Previous message: Ilusha: "Re: Nonlinear term in the NLS"
- In reply to: Ilusha: "Re: Nonlinear term in the NLS"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]