Re: Question about global stablity?
From: Thomas Nordhaus (thnord2002_at_yahoo.de)
Date: 11/19/04
- Next message: Thomas Nordhaus: "Re: Question about global stablity?"
- Previous message: Roger Bagula: "Martin Map (a.k.a. hopalong)"
- In reply to:(deleted message) James Meiss: "Re: Question about global stablity?"
- Next in thread: James Meiss: "Re: Question about global stablity?"
- Reply:(deleted message) James Meiss: "Re: Question about global stablity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 18:21:17 +0100
James Meiss <jdm@NOSPAM.invalid> schrieb:
>In article <iv7rp095r4v7kj7q2joo3210al9ba3kicp@4ax.com>,
> Thomas Nordhaus <thnord2002@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>
>> Let Phi(x) be the corresponding flow map after one unit of time. Then
>> your condition implies that all eigenvalues of Phi have modulus < K
>> where 0 <= K < 1. So Banach's fixed point theorem should show that Phi
>> is a global uniform contraction which has exactly one fixed point
>> which is globally asymptotically stable, then.
>
>I also didn't read the question closely enough, obviously.
>
>However, I'm not sure your idea is correct. Just because the Jacobian,
>Df(x) has negative eigenvalues for all x, doesn't mean that the time one
>map will. I think a counter example is the famous example of
>Marcus-Yamabe (in all the ode books, such as Perko) is one where a
>linear system is everywhere "locally" stable, but the linear flow is not.
^^^^^^
Sorry, I don't know this counter-example. Could you state it? For
*linear* equations x' = Ax with all eigenvalues in the left half plane
the linear flow e^(tA) is a contraction and 0 is globally
asymptotically stable.
The argument with the time-1 map isn't very clean, I agree. But for
linear contracting flows one can always find a T>0 such that
|Phi(T,x)| < |x|/2, for example.
Thomas
>
>There is the relation
> det(Phi(t)) = exp ( int ( tr ( Df(x(s)) ), s=0..t)
>where Phi(t) is the linearized time-t map along the orbit from x(0) to
>x(t).
>
>So if tr(Df(x)) < 0, say, then you can guarantee that det(Phi(t)) < 1.
>But does that mean its eigenvalues are all smaller than one? No.
- Next message: Thomas Nordhaus: "Re: Question about global stablity?"
- Previous message: Roger Bagula: "Martin Map (a.k.a. hopalong)"
- In reply to:(deleted message) James Meiss: "Re: Question about global stablity?"
- Next in thread: James Meiss: "Re: Question about global stablity?"
- Reply:(deleted message) James Meiss: "Re: Question about global stablity?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|