Re: Retinal image size calculation for human eye.
From: andrew Judd (andrewedwardjudd_at_hotmail.com)
Date: 06/21/04
- Next message: Robin Hull: "Re: Film Flaking"
- Previous message: Alex: "Image quality for polarized beam"
- In reply to: Bruce Woodburn: "Re: Retinal image size calculation for human eye."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 21 Jun 2004 05:19:58 -0700
"Bruce Woodburn" <brucew@dccnet.com> wrote in message news:<10dcr82nec9h888@corp.supernews.com>...
> I don't know if this is going to help...
>
> Imagine you start with a normal eye that is in focus at distance. To convert
> it to a myopic eye, you put an imaginary plus sphere lens inside the eye at
> the plane of the natural lens, about 5.5 millimeters behind the cornea. To
> compensate, a minus spectacle lens is placed 14mm in front of the cornea.
> You now have a reversed Galilean Telescope (paired plus and minus lenses)
> which makes the image smaller. The opposite situation is true for hyperopes,
> who see a magnified image (about 2.5% for each diopter)
>
> When you look through a minus lens that is "too strong", your natural lens
> accommodates by becoming more plus. This increases the strength of the
> reversed Galilean Telescope and reduces the image size. It's not so much the
> minus lens that is making the image smaller as the accommodation of your
> lens. If accommodation is paralyzed with eye drops, the image would go
> blurry, but remain closer to the same size.
>
> I think the "2.5% per diopter" rule is pretty close for both minus and plus
> lenses.
>
> Bruce
>
> PS: A Galilean Telescope is a 2 lens telescope (plus objective, minus
> eyepiece) arrange so their focal points coincide. Magnification (or
> minification) is the ratio of their strength in diopters (e.g.: a +1 diopter
> objective and a -4 diopter eyepiece gives a 4 power scope.) This power
> calculation doesn't apply to the armchair experiment described here because
> of the complexity of the optical system.
This sounds pretty reasonable Bruce.
Thanks
Andrew
- Next message: Robin Hull: "Re: Film Flaking"
- Previous message: Alex: "Image quality for polarized beam"
- In reply to: Bruce Woodburn: "Re: Retinal image size calculation for human eye."
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|