Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement
From: half_pint (me_at_privacy.net)
Date: 07/30/04
- Next message: Repeating Rifle: "Re: Negative index"
- Previous message: half_pint: "Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement"
- In reply to: Dave Jarvis: "Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement"
- Next in thread: Shrikantha S. Shastry: "Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:12:17 +0100
"Dave Jarvis" <dave@nospam.net> wrote in message
news:4109F8D7.1090105@nospam.net...
> Hi, Half Pint.
>
> > "Figure 4.2 shows the behaviour of a particle when passing between
> > two magnetic fields. "
> > Looks like two magnets and one magnetic field to me!! Make your
> > mind up.
>
> Whoops! Looks like I erred here in a big way. I'm pretty sure that if
> you have a north and south magnet facing each other only one magnetic
> field will be present. I have fixed this. Thanks! (I could be wrong
> in my wrongness, though ...)
Well I suppose you could say it was two fields combined, which it is,
two fields combined into one.It's a bit like saying you have two half_pints
in a pint glass, it's true but it's a bit confusing to think of it like
that!!
( but not half as confusing as particle deflection in a magnetic field!!!)
>
> Dave
- Next message: Repeating Rifle: "Re: Negative index"
- Previous message: half_pint: "Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement"
- In reply to: Dave Jarvis: "Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement"
- Next in thread: Shrikantha S. Shastry: "Re: Layman's Guide to Quantum Entanglement"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|