Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate
From: Jonathan Silverlight (jsilverlight_at_spam.merseia.fsnet.co.uk.invalid)
Date: 08/09/04
- Previous message: West Coast Engineering: "Gerber Scale Instructions"
- In reply to: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Next in thread: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Reply: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 00:00:29 +0100
In message <e988316b.0408090642.18da4440@posting.google.com>, Ralph
Sansbury <r9ns@bestweb.net> writes
>
> Good to hear you are feeling better.
> What are the formulae for the errors in the lidar and radar
>reflections? The references and discussion on my web page show they
>are large. That is some of the moon reflections are from secondary
>scattering etc and the radar reflections from Venus etc supposedly
>showing different surface heights for different pixels of the image
>have larger error bars so that they are indistinguishable from noise.
How about some references to back up that assertion? Last time this came
up you said Craig Markwardt told you, but we know that was mistaken, to
be charitable.
Is the noise figure in one of the original 1960s papers, or the more
recent Magellan or Pioneer results?
And can you _please_ fix the line wrap on
<http://users.bestweb.net/~sansbury/Doppler/Spacecraft%20Doppler.doc> so
it's more readable?
- Previous message: West Coast Engineering: "Gerber Scale Instructions"
- In reply to: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Next in thread: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Reply: Ralph Sansbury: "Re: P10 Acceleration: Light Speed Doesn't Extrapolate"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|