Re: metal optics - an ununderstood chapter in optics becomes understandable
From: josefmatz (josefmatz_at_arcor.de)
Date: 10/15/04
- Previous message: Alpha Omega: "Re: OT: Historical Amnesia"
- In reply to: josefmatz: "metal optics - an ununderstood chapter in optics becomes understandable"
- Next in thread: Phil Hobbs: "Re: metal optics - an ununderstood chapter in optics becomes understandable"
- Reply: Phil Hobbs: "Re: metal optics - an ununderstood chapter in optics becomes understandable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 05:13:35 +0200
An additional comment to the meaning of the rule i gave you above:
The room of fields with a complex k - vektor is an imaginary vectorroom. A
description of full three - dimensional problems should - in my opinion also
be possible.
In the case of real k - vektors you have
two vectorial independant parts the perpendicular and the parallel polarized
wave which are related to the
normal vector n on the plane of incident. But you can also use any other
vektor to describe your polarization with respect to. For example if your
reflekted wave falls onto another makroscopic surface, which is totally
different oriented you need a transform of the wave from the one surface
normal to the other. What is parallel polarized at the one surface might
have also a perpendicular polarized component on the other surface.
If you have multiple waves which you do want to to superpose, because they
are overlapping, you first must
transform them all to the same direction vektor before you add the fields
and calculate the Pointing vector.
Thats the symmetry with real k.
If you have komplex k - Vektors, you have in general cases two different
directions for the real and imaginary part of k. Two directions are enough
to describe everything, that means you do - in principle need no normal
vector to describe your problem. On the other hand, the symmetry of real k
has to come in in your solution.
And the answer is:
If you have many waves you want to overlap in a 3D situation with komplex
k - vectors, you need a rule how
to calculate the fiels as a sum of several fields. And as far as i know it
presently this looks so in general:
Calculate all E Waves and calculte one flux - the sum of all E - Waves and
do the same with all H - Waves
and then add these two fluxes. The outcome of this rule in the easy case of
a simple bulk material is the rule i gave you. It is the superposition
theorem for E - Waves and H - Waves in full 3D Cases. I do not tell you here
explicit, how E - Waves and H - Waves are described in 3D Cases. In the
moment thats my secret.
This is no lekture as the above because these things are not treated up to
the final presently.
- Previous message: Alpha Omega: "Re: OT: Historical Amnesia"
- In reply to: josefmatz: "metal optics - an ununderstood chapter in optics becomes understandable"
- Next in thread: Phil Hobbs: "Re: metal optics - an ununderstood chapter in optics becomes understandable"
- Reply: Phil Hobbs: "Re: metal optics - an ununderstood chapter in optics becomes understandable"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|