Re: variable focal length eyeglass lens question
From: Clayton Weaver (cgweav_at_aol.com)
Date: 01/15/05
- Previous message: Skywise: "re:Non-visible-light/IR focusing lenses-Si, Ge, ZiSe?"
- In reply to: Joe: "Re: variable focal length eyeglass lens question"
- Next in thread: Clayton Weaver: "Re: variable focal length eyeglass lens question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 15 Jan 2005 23:10:34 GMT
>You may want to discuss the
>different variations with a knowledgeable ophthalmologist; mine
>specifically recommended the Rodenstock (can't remember their trade
>name),
These are (IIRC) "Varilux".
The last pair were the same
lens brand, but at a lower
magnification. If these worked
as well as those did, I would
have no complaints.
I am wondering what change
in the physics at higher magnifications
can produce these extreme abberations
in a progressive lens that works fine at
a lower magnification.
Ie, why isn't it a problem solved by
merely by changing the lens topography?
Thanks for the news group tip.
Regards,
Clayton Weaver
<mailto: cgweav@aol.com>
"Everyone is ignorant, just about different things." Will Rogers
- Previous message: Skywise: "re:Non-visible-light/IR focusing lenses-Si, Ge, ZiSe?"
- In reply to: Joe: "Re: variable focal length eyeglass lens question"
- Next in thread: Clayton Weaver: "Re: variable focal length eyeglass lens question"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|