Re: Book for Scientific data Analysis
- From: dot@xxxxxxx (AG)
- Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 09:40:58 -0700
In article <ef1l811fmmtqmpc7ni5kkekiajeafuhn4d@xxxxxxx>,
dgross01@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Bevington is good but old school. Modern thought is to use
> exploratory analysis as seen in most any book by Tukey.
>
> NIST gives some guidance
> http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/eda.htm
The trouble is that Tukey's books are not necessarily "new school". In
fact, it is interesting to note that in his EDA book he spends time
explaining how you could use rulled paper to draw a graph as well as
similar tricks that were useful in the 1970's. Many of his subsequent
chapters dealing with fits are also completely out of date.
While Tukey is probably responsible for much of modern EDA, I'd recommend
using a slightly more updated approach as the starting point. This can be
found, for example, on the NIST site:
http://www.itl.nist.gov/div898/handbook/eda/eda.htm
I also recommend (particularly for the examples):
http://www.ruf.rice.edu/~lane/rvls.html
HTH,
A.G.
WaveMetrics, Inc.
Makers of IGOR Pro
http://www.wavemetrics.com
.
- References:
- Book for Scientific data Analysis
- From: dell
- Re: Book for Scientific data Analysis
- From: Kevin Schultz
- Re: Book for Scientific data Analysis
- From: dgross01
- Book for Scientific data Analysis
- Prev by Date: Re: Kalimar question
- Next by Date: Re: Looking for lamp, absorber or fluorescense substance near 200 nm
- Previous by thread: Re: Book for Scientific data Analysis
- Next by thread: Re: Book for Scientific data Analysis
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|