Re: Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- From: "redbelly" <redbelly98@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Jun 2005 06:15:38 -0700
Richard J Kinch wrote:
> You're missing a few principles. Like blackbody radiation. And that
> temperature and heat are different things altogether.
I didn't consider blackbody radiation, but yes at high enough
temperatures that would become important.
I reread my post, and don't see where have I confused temperature with
heat. Could you show specifically where I did that?
Thanks,
Mark
.
- References:
- Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- From: adamsch1
- Re: Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- From: Peltio
- Re: Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- From: jrayces
- Re: Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- From: redbelly
- Re: Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- From: AES
- Re: Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- From: redbelly
- Re: Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- From: Richard J Kinch
- Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- Prev by Date: Re: Mirror's Zerikes at Angle
- Next by Date: Re: Mirror microscope objectives for the IR
- Previous by thread: Re: Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- Next by thread: Re: Focal length effect usefulness of a burning lens?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|