Re: What is the Real Mechanism of Light Mechanism?



simplesong1004@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

>People today had a bad fixed prejudice, action only through a medium
>and medium equals the mass, mainly because of the influence of particle
>physics. This traditional fixed idea seriously distorted the science of
>understanding the light and its propagation characters.
>
>Light is exactly the same as sound wave in propagating character.
>However, in standard high school texts they deny this fact, the light
>is entirely different from sound wave. It is due to a strong influence
>of particle physicists who believe light is corpuscular photons.
>
>Sound wave once released from its source propagates through the air
>phase with its own speed that is nothing to do with the speed of its
>source. If the source moves at some speeds there occurs the Doppler
>effect. Light is exactly the same as acoustic waves, in terms of its
>propagating character. Light pulse once emitted from its source
>propagates through empty space at its own speed, and this speed is
>nothing to do with the speed of its source.
>
>Thus there occurs the Doppler effect when the source moves at some
>speeds. One cannot hear the steamwhistle influenced by the Doppler
>effect if one is in the same train. It is because the elongated
>wavelength of steamwhistle due to Doppler effect turns out to be
>restored to its initial dimensions when he receives it in the same
>train, because he runs with the same speed as the train does.
>
>Light is exactly the same. If light source and the detector are on the
>same coordinate system, or on the earth, one can measure always the
>absolute speed of light, without any relation with the orbiting speed
>of the earth. Elongated or condensed wavelength of light due to Doppler
>effect becomes restored when the detector receives it.
>
>Because the detector has to receive the wave signal as it advances or
>in reverse case retreats with the same speed as the source, Albert
>Einstein didn't know this simple plain truth. Since his photon travels
>with its momentum given by its source, as though a shut bullet travels
>in the space with its momentum given by its rifles. Obviously the speed
>of bullet involves the speed of rifle. So Einstein set forth the famous
>postulation for his special theory of relativity: If a number of
>observer are moving at uniform velocity in respect to each other and to
>a source of light, and if each observer measures the speed of the light
>emerging from the source, they will all obtain the same value.
>
>The same value in his word means the absolute speed of light from which
>the speed of source is excluded. In order to explain the failed
>experiment of Michelson-Morley, the speed of source v had to be
>removed, but Einstein didn't know how to remove it from additive
>formula, c=c'+ v, so he made his postulation c=c' when v approach the
>speed c. Thus he proposed the general principle of projectile mechanics
>involving the travelling mechanism of light, expressed with a stupid
>equation: v=(v'+u)/(1+v'u/c^2), by borrowing the idea of Lorentz's
>space contraction. And he announced that the speed of light is constant
>anywhere in the cosmic space, because the light has the fastest speed
>of all possible speeds in the nature, based on his also
>stupid equation, m=m'(1-v^2/c^2)^-1/2. Mass increases its absolute
>value as its speed increases, so if the speed of mass approaches the
>speed of light its acceleration can no more contribute to its speed
>increment.
>
>However, this is a fairy tale if we believe that the vacant space
>itself is only the medium of light propagation. Because the vacant
>space is asolutely uniform anywhere in this cosmic space, so the speed
>of light has to have a naturally constant speed. Then how can we
>explain the light refraction taking place between different materials
>with different optical density?
>
>I could learn this phenomenon in Dr. Hansik Yoon's textbook, "Natural
>Science Founded on A New Atomic Model", (www.yoonsatom.net) The Light
>section in his book(Part IV) clearly explains the refraction phenomenon
>with a simple equation built without any postulation, involving no
>speed factor, but containing wavelength of incident light, mass density
>factor, as well as incident angle of incoming light.
>
>Dr. Yoon asserts in his book that the light refraction can take place
>because the atomic nuclei in mass system subdivides the incoming light
>wave into numerous micro beams which develope into spherical waves, so
>the constructive interference between them build a refractive light
>with a different running direction. He also shows a number of
>schematical experiments of light refraction, utilizing a large number
>of concentric half circles representing sequential wave phases, drawn
>on two transparent films, and uperimposing them.
>
>And he claims the empty space itself is the only medium of light
>propagation, and element particles building material system has nothing
>to do with this light propagation. Although this assertion conflicts
>critically against the traditional concept, it is quite correct. People
>today has been taught that electrons building the material system
>serves to transmit the light passing through material system. Feynman
>had also the same idea, so Dr. Yoon in his book debates critically the
>Feynman's equation representing refractive index, built based on his
>QED theory, saying that it is a typical example of cheating people with
>a fantastic mathematical trick.
>
>As a plain truth, electric and magnetic force can act through this
>empty vacant space without any aid of mass particles. Dr. Yoon
>emphasises in his book that we have to abandon our old prejudice,
>action only through a medium and medium equals the mass.
>
>Particle physicists believe that the electric and magnetic force acting
>through this vacant space is due to exchange of their energy grains
>traveling with their momentum, and disregard the true mechanism of how
>these forces can act without medium. This incorrect belief, mass system
>
>interferes the speed of light is inherited from our science pioneer
>such as Fizeau who tried to investigate in 1845, how does the speed of
>light change due to moving speed of its medium, such as water. He
>mis-evaluated the light interference occurred between two light beams,
>one running along the flowing water and the other against that, as
>speed difference between them. But it is quite incorrect!
>
>Imagine two rockets. One approaches the earth and the other departs
>from the earth with the same speed. If they emit lights with the same
>wavelength to a detector on the earth, the detector would receive two
>signals interfering with one another, exactly the same pattern as that
>Fizeau obtained in his experiment.
>
>Have these two lights different speed? Absolutely no. They are exactly
>the same. This is the reevaluation of Fizeau's experiment by Dr.Yoon in
>
>his book, and he says if vacuum empty space itself is only the medium
>of light, there cannot exist such a moving coordinate system in this
>universe as far as concerned to transmission of light, which is the
>base of Einstein's two relativity theory.
>
>newedana
>
>Based on Dr. Hansik Yoon's new physics, "Natural Science Founded on A
>New Atomic Model". (www.yoonsatom.net)

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
    ... >IF Light can display properies as both a particle and a waveform, ... >Mass characteristics? ... >different speeds in relation to the crossover point of teh oscillation? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
    ... As the particle moves, the field -lines are being rearranged, ... When the particle speeds up, ... Mass could be constant during acceleration and equal to the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Light as a particle in a wave?
    ... >IF Light can display properies as both a particle and a waveform, ... >Mass characteristics? ... >different speeds in relation to the crossover point of teh oscillation? ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
    ... As the particle moves, the field -lines are being rearranged, ... When the particle speeds up, ... Mass could be constant during acceleration and equal to the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is there a relativistic mass?
    ... As the particle moves, the field -lines are being rearranged, ... When the particle speeds up, ... for the rearranging process, and the force-field ... Mass could be constant during acceleration and equal to the rest ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)