Re: Negative Index Hype
- From: "Charles Attends" <inconnu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:32:54 -0400
"Charles Attends" wrote
snip
> Dr Tom Mackay, of the University of Edinburgh's School of Mathematics,
said: ?Through its simplicity, this method
> represents an exciting breakthrough for inexpensive exploitation of
negative refraction technologies. The prospects
> for near-perfect lenses, and beyond, brings dreams a step closer to
reality.?
How will a negative index will bring us "near-perfect lenses"?
As an optical engineer / designer I think that the best lenses produced
nowadays are remarkably close to "near-perfection" (as with
photo-lithographic lenses) in spite of the limits imposed by physics and
mathematics , but of course I am highly biased.
How will this help us overcome the present limitations of geometrical and
physical optics (Fermat's principle, diffraction and all) I do not know.
I am not negative (sic) about this development, however what I think is that
important discoveries often lead to totally novel and unexpected
applications.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Negative Index Hype
- From: Bob May
- Re: Negative Index Hype
- References:
- Negative Index Hype
- From: Charles Attends
- Negative Index Hype
- Prev by Date: Re: Soliton Pulse technology?
- Next by Date: Re: Imaging Anamorphic Beam Expander
- Previous by thread: Negative Index Hype
- Next by thread: Re: Negative Index Hype
- Index(es):