Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- From: "willryu" <willryu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 May 2006 15:02:39 -0700
Christian Wilms wrote:
H. Brueggemann <helge-berlin@xxxxxx> wrote:
They put it all into one tiny device with USB 2.0
No need for an external counter card
With a time resolution of 2.5 ns? That would be a tad slow for
fluorescence lifetime measurements ...
Am I missing something or are you kidding?
I contacted them and yes it is 2.5 ns. They told me they will have a
100 ps time resolution unit in 16-20 weeks.
For comparison, Picoquant's stuff does 40 to 4 ps.
-will
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- From: Christian Wilms
- Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- References:
- Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- From: H. Brueggemann
- Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- From: Christian Wilms
- Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- Prev by Date: Re: Guoy phase shift in sequential Gaussian beam tracing
- Next by Date: Contrast Ratio
- Previous by thread: Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- Next by thread: Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- Index(es):