Re: Why Isn't Sapphire Important Optically?
- From: Salmon Egg <salmonegg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2006 05:16:59 GMT
On 5/29/06 4:58 AM, in article
17961$447ae1d8$d5a03e69$26299@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "urs boegli" <no@xxxxx>
wrote:
HiI know that plastic watch "crystals" seem to use the plastic's springiness
as a Swiss citizen I may be qualified to discuss about watches and
sapphires ;-)))
There are two applications in watches:
1 bearings in mechanical watches
2 scratch free cover glass
The big mass of sapphire is used for the 2nd applications. It's used in
higer prized watches although the costs of one such glass (formed &
polished) might be in the range of 10 to 20$.
The big advantage of sapphire is the very flat transparancy from UV up
to about 6 micrometer. I used them as IR windows, 1/2" windows might be
a few $ only.
to hold it onto the watch. I presume that sapphire watch crystals are much
stiffer. How are they attached to a watch?
Bill
-- Ferme le Bush
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Isn't Sapphire Important Optically?
- From: Dave Schaack
- Re: Why Isn't Sapphire Important Optically?
- References:
- Why Isn't Sapphire Important Optically?
- From: John Savard
- Re: Why Isn't Sapphire Important Optically?
- From: urs boegli
- Why Isn't Sapphire Important Optically?
- Prev by Date: Re: Sensor selection
- Next by Date: Homemade DIY optical breadboard and mounts?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Isn't Sapphire Important Optically?
- Next by thread: Re: Why Isn't Sapphire Important Optically?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|