Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- From: usenet02@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Christian Wilms)
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 11:02:58 +0200
willryu <willryu@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I contacted them and yes it is 2.5 ns. They told me they will have a
100 ps time resolution unit in 16-20 weeks.
Which would be a lot better, but still a tad slow. What would the
fastest accessible lifetime there be? Depending on the IRF somewhere in
the range of 0.6 to 1.0 ns?
But it does sound like an interesting approach. I'm curious what the
pricing of the high resolution version will be.
It does sound not unlike the concept used by Europhoton
(<http://www.europhoton.de/> be fore-warned: the website is bad) - just
that they use location sensitive detection, allowing very simple
spectral TCSPC.
Regards, Chris
.
- References:
- Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- From: H. Brueggemann
- Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- From: Christian Wilms
- Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- From: willryu
- Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- Prev by Date: Re: light has mass
- Next by Date: Optical spectrometer design literature/software
- Previous by thread: Re: Becker & Hickl versus Picoquant
- Next by thread: spectral discharge data of metal halide gasses?
- Index(es):