Re: Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- From: "Rex Stomponato" <none@none>
- Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2006 16:38:01 -0400
"Rex Stomponato" <none@none> wrote in message
news:12jso6qnglbta69@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thanks for your answers.
What puzzles me is the following.
Maxwell equations should be able to deal with most light propagation issues.
Why can't we study an optical system, even complicated, say a zoom lens,
using a maxwellian approach from the start?
I understand that such a lens is designed first by using ray optics and
then "refined" taking into account wave optics (diffraction, polarization),
at least that's the impression I get by looking at various books / magazines
/ internet resources.
Is this a question of computing power?
Forgive my audacity but I suspect that's largely a question of tradition.
Ray optics has indeed proved its efficacy for a long time, but is it not
time to switch?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- From: Timo Nieminen
- Re: Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- From: redbelly
- Re: Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- References:
- Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- From: Rex Stomponato
- Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- Prev by Date: Re: Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- Next by Date: Re: Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- Previous by thread: Re: Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- Next by thread: Re: Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- Index(es):