Re: infra-red and mirrors
- From: "Adam Chapman" <adam.chapman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 25 Oct 2006 17:35:55 -0700
Thanks everyone. The main reason I suggested the mirror periscope idea
is because ny aircraft needs to have a very low radar cross-section.
A spherical gimbal would have the same radar cross section when the
radar is looking at the aircraft from all directions, where as a simple
flat plate mirror pokking out of the bottom would only have a
significant radar signature over a very short range of directions.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: infra-red and mirrors
- From: Adam Chapman
- Re: infra-red and mirrors
- References:
- infra-red and mirrors
- From: Adam Chapman
- Re: infra-red and mirrors
- From: Sam Goldwasser
- Re: infra-red and mirrors
- From: Adam Chapman
- Re: infra-red and mirrors
- From: Sam Goldwasser
- infra-red and mirrors
- Prev by Date: Re: Wave Optics vs Ray Optics
- Next by Date: Re: infra-red and mirrors
- Previous by thread: Re: infra-red and mirrors
- Next by thread: Re: infra-red and mirrors
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|