Re: inverse square law and "perfect" laser
- From: "redbelly" <redbelly98@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Nov 2006 15:37:46 -0800
Salmon Egg wrote:
On 11/21/06 10:03 AM, in article
1164132208.228034.263790@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Gary Jefferson"
<garyjefferson123@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Laser light obeys the inverse square law, but is this *only* becauseAlthough others have answered your question, they were not blunt enough.
the diameter of the laser beam increases linearly (at distance), or is
there something else fundamental going on to decrease light energy as
it travels?
I suppose another way to ask the same question is, in a perfect vacuum,
do all the photons that a central source emits make it to the edge of
some distant sphere, or are there other effects that cause the photon
waves to dissipate or interfere (e.g, cancel out) as they travel?
Laser beams do not obey the inverse square. They obey the inverse square law
as an approximation for very large distances.
Bill
-- Fermez le Bush
Just to add, trying to stay blunt: conservation of energy is the rule.
Laser intensity is inversely proportional to beam area. Only when the
beam area obeys the square-law will intensity obey the inverse-square
law.
Mark
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: inverse square law and "perfect" laser
- From: Boxman
- Re: inverse square law and "perfect" laser
- References:
- inverse square law and "perfect" laser
- From: Gary Jefferson
- Re: inverse square law and "perfect" laser
- From: Salmon Egg
- inverse square law and "perfect" laser
- Prev by Date: Re: Hi and about KDP
- Next by Date: Re: inverse square law and "perfect" laser
- Previous by thread: Re: inverse square law and "perfect" laser
- Next by thread: Re: inverse square law and "perfect" laser
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|