Re: Which OPTICs design program is best ?
- From: "Jamie" <jacarter3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Nov 2006 07:14:37 -0800
My brother gives me a hard time when he says that "barbeque" is process
not a sauce. Well, it's been my experience that optical design is a
process, not a software program. If you know the process, then you use
the software to accomplish that process.
Having used Genii PC, OSLO, SynOpSys, KDP, ACCOS V and Code V, I have
found that all of the tips I know are implemented fairly well on all of
these with some doing better than others in certain areas. But the
process of finding a good solution regarding performance, complexity
and manufacturing yield is the same for all.
My question to you is: how many new tips will you learn if you leave
the familiar and venture out of your comfort zone? My guess is that
such a move will stimulate your creativity and re-organize your
thinking in new ways. This may make the transition much more profitable
and enjoyable than you think.
Just my thoughts regarding optical design...
James A Carter III
http://www.jacarter3.com
http://www.opticalconsulting.com
On Nov 28, 9:26 am, tinou...@xxxxxxx (Etienne Labaume) wrote:
Joseph <Labrumopticale...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've been using ZMAX for 10 years of more and I need to upgrade my program.
Is there a better, and less-expensive program available now ?
If so which one and why ?I'm new to optical design, but isn't this rule true:"The best tool is the one you know the best"
How much time will you spend learning how to apply to
a new software all the tips you know about Zemax after
10 years of use ?
--
Etienne
.
- References:
- Re: Which OPTICs design program is best ?
- From: Etienne Labaume
- Re: Which OPTICs design program is best ?
- Prev by Date: Re: [Beginner] A lens in Zemax
- Next by Date: Re: Need help - InfraRed partially transparent plastics
- Previous by thread: Re: Which OPTICs design program is best ?
- Next by thread: Intensity distribution of a Lummer-Gehrcke plate
- Index(es):