Re: Resolution with Gaussian point spread function
- From: redbelly <redbelly98@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 14:42:12 -0700
On Jun 24, 5:23 pm, spasmous2 <spasm...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If you have a Gaussian PSF, then how can you determine resolution
(resolvability) using the Raleigh criterion?
You can't, for the very reason you state below.
As I understand the
Raleigh criterion says the maximum of one PSF must sit on top of the
minimum of the neighbor for them to be "just" resolved. This is OK for
a sinc-like PSF but what about a Gaussian PSF which doesn't even have
a minimum?
A good criteria for Gaussian beams (assuming equal waist sizes) is
that their centers are separated by more than 1 waist. That will give
two distinct maxima in the overall intensity distribution. If the
separation is 1 waist or less, there is just 1 intensity maximum.
Regards,
Mark
.
- References:
- Resolution with Gaussian point spread function
- From: spasmous2
- Resolution with Gaussian point spread function
- Prev by Date: Resolution with Gaussian point spread function
- Next by Date: Re: Firing SSY1 trigger
- Previous by thread: Resolution with Gaussian point spread function
- Next by thread: Re: Resolution with Gaussian point spread function
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|