Re: Another polarization question
- From: Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@ .- --- -. DOT .- t>
- Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2007 09:38:55 +0100
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 15:27:49 -0000, "Fleetie"
<fleetie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Helpful person" <rrllff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
If the separation of the blinds is small then light will not be able
to vibrate in that direction. Hence the light passing through it is
polarized. This efficiency is dependent on the blind separation as
compared to the wavelength of light.
So are you saying then that the waves that are vibrating parallel
the lengths of the open "slits" are the ones that get through?
If so, have you looked at the wikipedia article on this?
"Note that the polarization direction is perpendicular to the wires; the
concept that waves "slip through" the gaps between the wires is incorrect."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polariser
Martin
Wire mesh is made of ectrically conducting material.
A horizontally oriented slot antenna radiates vertically polarized.
Think of the wire mesh as an array of slot antennas.
http://hjem.get2net.dk/ole_nykjaer/oz2oe/antenner/10wg.html
Dielectrical antennas made of insulating material
react the other way round.
Think of the plastic molecules as dielectical slots.
w.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another polarization question
- From: surfer
- Re: Another polarization question
- References:
- Another polarization question
- From: surfer
- Re: Another polarization question
- From: Helpful person
- Re: Another polarization question
- From: Fleetie
- Another polarization question
- Prev by Date: Call for Papers: The 2008 International Conference on Scientific Computing (CSC'08), USA, July 2008
- Next by Date: Re: Another polarization question
- Previous by thread: Re: Another polarization question
- Next by thread: Re: Another polarization question
- Index(es):