Re: backward ray tracing
- From: Skywise <into@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 05:24:58 -0000
Helpful person <rrllff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:3cc0512f-a127-4ca8-8cf3-
ea94cff7ef4b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
There was definately an accuracy problem in the old days of double
precision ForTran programs. However, although this should not still
be the case I have found it to be so.
Haven't they heard of arbitray precision? A fractal program I had
from the old days of DOS could do arbitrary precision to mind-numbingly
large values that were only limited by your CPU power and patience.
Back in the days of 386's, you had to be REALLY patient.
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: backward ray tracing
- From: Dave Bell
- Re: backward ray tracing
- References:
- backward ray tracing
- From: surface2air
- Re: backward ray tracing
- From: Helpful person
- Re: backward ray tracing
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: backward ray tracing
- From: Helpful person
- backward ray tracing
- Prev by Date: Re: backward ray tracing
- Next by Date: Re: backward ray tracing
- Previous by thread: Re: backward ray tracing
- Next by thread: Re: backward ray tracing
- Index(es):