Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: "James R \(Jim\) Lynch III" <jrlynch3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 18:12:29 GMT
Why would you want this, Al?
I avoid the use of the A2 term in the ZEMAX asphere polynomial because it's
non-standard. Its use makes it difficult to go between CodeV and ZEMAX and I
suspect most diamond point turning shops don't have their machines
programmed to handle the A2 term.
In addition, I've seen many different formulations of the Seidel aberrations
which include the A4 term, but I've never seen one which includes the A2
term.
James R (Jim) Lynch III
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Al Greynolds
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Al Greynolds
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- References:
- Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Al Greynolds
- Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- Prev by Date: Re: backward ray tracing
- Next by Date: Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- Previous by thread: Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- Next by thread: Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|