Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes

From: Al Greynolds <awgreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:45:54 -0800 (PST)

On Feb 22, 11:15 am, Helpful person <rrl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

But the 2nd order is not an aberration.

But it changes the paraxial properties of the surface and therefore
the contribution to the next order aberrations. I have done the math
and the 2nd order term DOES also change the Seidel contributions (just
as LENSFORGE realized but not ZEMAX).

Al
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
  - From: Helpful person

References:
- Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
  - From: Al Greynolds
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
  - From: Helpful person
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
  - From: Al Greynolds
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
  - From: Helpful person

Prev by Date: Re: backward ray tracing
Next by Date: Re: backward ray tracing
Previous by thread: Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
Next by thread: Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread