Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Al Greynolds <awgreynolds@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2008 06:37:30 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 23, 6:36 am, Helpful person <rrl...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
We must agree to differ. Using Seidels for higher order correction
seems to me to be a strange method. For series expansion of
aberration coefficients I would expect better results using Buchdal's
methods.
www.richardfisher.com
Actually, I rarely USE the Seidels in my actual design work. I was
only doing a comparison of ZEMAX to the much less expensive LENSFORGE
and happen to notice the Seidel discrepancies. By the way, the ZEMAX
people have already got back to me, and their Seidel documentation and
code will be fixed in the next release.
Al
.
- References:
- Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Al Greynolds
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Helpful person
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Al Greynolds
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Helpful person
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Al Greynolds
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Helpful person
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Al Greynolds
- Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- From: Helpful person
- Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- Prev by Date: Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- Next by Date: Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- Previous by thread: Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- Next by thread: Re: Incorrect Seidel aberration calculations in lens design codes
- Index(es):