Re: Light Duality
- From: Quantum Ray <QuantumRay@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 14:54:16 -0700 (PDT)
On Mar 27, 1:31 pm, Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSensel...@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I'm not that particular about phonons, but plasmons are just plain
silly--they're just electromagnetic surface waves, so if you need a name
for their quanta, they're photons. The name "plasmon" is a particularly
lurid example of the excesses of nomenclature that Lamb was talking about.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs (plasmonic *ugh* physicist)
What about the name "hole", as in an electron-hole pair generated when
a photon, err, I mean a light quanta with proper energy (wavelength),
is absorbed by semiconductor? Actually I was thinking about this
process when I posted the original message.
Q Ray
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Light Duality
- From: AES
- Re: Light Duality
- References:
- Light Duality
- From: Quantum Ray
- Re: Light Duality
- From: p . kinsler
- Re: Light Duality
- From: Louis Boyd
- Re: Light Duality
- From: AES
- Re: Light Duality
- From: Helpful person
- Re: Light Duality
- From: AES
- Re: Light Duality
- From: Marc Reinig
- Re: Light Duality
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Light Duality
- Prev by Date: Re: Light Duality
- Next by Date: Re: Light Duality
- Previous by thread: Re: Light Duality
- Next by thread: Re: Light Duality
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|