Re: Most efficient laser?
- From: Skywise <into@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:38:42 GMT
Richard Saam <rdsaam@xxxxxxx> wrote in news:D%qRj.264749$cQ1.60053@bgtnsc04-
news.ops.worldnet.att.net:
Intuitively, it would appear the more photons the better effect.
Would not coherence be a factor? That is, just crossing any two
laser beams would not have an additive effect, even if they were
the same wavelength. I would think the electric fields would have
to be in phase.
And even so, this self lensing implies it occurs over the length
of the lights travel through the medium. Where two beams cross,
there's not a lot of medium, as opposed to, say, a single beam
traveling for several meters through something.
Just my amateur 2 cents.
Brian
--
http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism
Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html
Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html
Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Most efficient laser?
- From: Don Klipstein
- Re: Most efficient laser?
- References:
- Most efficient laser?
- From: Richard Saam
- Re: Most efficient laser?
- From: Phil Hobbs
- Re: Most efficient laser?
- From: Richard Saam
- Most efficient laser?
- Prev by Date: Re: Sapphire Glass Catalouge for Code V.
- Next by Date: Double transmission peak narrow band filter?
- Previous by thread: Re: Most efficient laser?
- Next by thread: Re: Most efficient laser?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|