Re: 1 FERTZ
From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 06/03/04
- Next message: alistair: "uncertainty and the age of the universe"
- Previous message: Y.Porat: "Re: 1 FERTZ"
- In reply to: Y.Porat: "Re: 1 FERTZ"
- Next in thread: Y.Porat: "Re: 1 FERTZ"
- Reply: Y.Porat: "Re: 1 FERTZ"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 16:40:17 +0200
Y.Porat wrote:
> Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<c9mo0e$i8o$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
>
>>Y.Porat wrote:
>>
>>>Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<c9kvur$4mk$1@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>Oh, BTW, when Newton computed the orbit of the earth around the
>>sun - had he also to consider all the details of the mass distribution
>>in the earth, in your opinion?
>
> ------------------
> there is only a litle difference between netons calculations and yourse:
>
> nertons is *macrocosm*
> wile your fertz should belong to microcosm
Complete utter nonsense. An electromagnetic wave which comes from the
orbit of the earth around the sun belongs *obviously* to the macrocosm,
since that orbit itself belongs to the macrocosm. That the wave is
essentially created by the motion of microscopic particles is
*IRRELEVANT*, since the *MACROSCOPIC MOTION* of these particles is what
creates the wave.
Does the creation of a radio wave by an antenna *also* belong to the
"microcosm"? If yes, then why is the frequency of the created wave
*equal* to the frequency of the oscillating charges and currents in the
antenna? Furthermore, why is this true *regardless of the shape of the
antenna*?
> unless you understand the differnce you will remain the real crackpot.
Unless you understand that your ramblings about "microcosm" are
nonsense, you will remain the real crackpot.
> ---------------------
>
>
>>
>>>you ignored all of the reservationes that
>>>other readers ponted to you about the real situation
>>>and stick o0nly to your paper.
>>
>>Err, no. I *dealt* with these reservations, and it turned out
>>that they are simply irrelevant for the problem at hand.
>
> ---------------------
> you are cheating at this point
No, not at all. You see problems where none are, since you didn't
understand a word of what the other posters really said.
> the sun radiation is *the relevant factor here:
Err, no. The solar *wind* is relevant here (since it provides
a plasma, and in a plasma, there is a cut-off frequency).
The solar *wind* has *nothing* to do with the solar *radiation*.
Thanks for again demonstrating to everyone that you have no clue
what you are talking about.
And, BTW, I *did* address the plasma frequency. It is *irrelevant*
for the problem at hand. All the things you brought up so far
were *irrelevant* to the problem at hand - i.e., they were
simply obfuscations. (see, I can also use some of your beloved
nonsensical accusations!)
> now since your new equations are so good
There is nothing new about these equations. As I said about 20 times
now, they have been known for at least 100 years now.
> please tell us :
> what will be the energy of your fertz (say in ergs)
The "fertz" is a frequency. Frequencies don't have energies.
Do you mean the energy of the wave with that frequency, or what?
If yes, what is so important about that?
> 2 what is the energy of sun radiation in comparison
> to that energy of your fertz.?
As I said above, the radiation of the sun is *totally*
*irrelevant* here.
If you mean the energy in the solar *wind*: why on earth should
*that* be relevant
> 3 what is your prve that suin radiation does not change
> during the year
The radiation of the sun (as well as the solar wind) do indeed
change during the year.
SO WHAT?????
> -----------------------
> crackpot
> Y.Porat
> ----------------
Thanks that you keep pointing that out?
Bye,
Bjoern
- Next message: alistair: "uncertainty and the age of the universe"
- Previous message: Y.Porat: "Re: 1 FERTZ"
- In reply to: Y.Porat: "Re: 1 FERTZ"
- Next in thread: Y.Porat: "Re: 1 FERTZ"
- Reply: Y.Porat: "Re: 1 FERTZ"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
