Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?
From: Bilge (dubious_at_radioactivex.lebesque-al.net)
Date: 06/04/04
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Discrete space"
- Previous message: Y.Porat: "Re: 1 FERTZ"
- In reply to: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Next in thread: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Reply: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 07:24:30 -0000
David Rutherford:
>
>
>Bilge wrote:
>> David Rutherford:
>> >
>> >If you come up with a specific, substantiated argument, let me know and
>> >I'll be happy to discuss it with you.
>>
>> Past experience indicates hell would freeze over before you actually
>> attempted to understand why your misconceptions of relativity are mis-
>> conceptions and why your ``theory'' of E&M is completely unphysical.
>
>Okay, this is good for a start. Give me _one_ example of the
>unphysicality of my theory, along with the epirical evidence to support
>your claim. Since you claim that it is "completely" unphysical, that
>should be easy for you.
The metric is wrong. We obviously don't live in a universe with
a metric which has a signature (++++) as is evident by the fact
that we can't turn around in time like we can turn around in space.
- Next message: Dirk Van de moortel: "Re: Discrete space"
- Previous message: Y.Porat: "Re: 1 FERTZ"
- In reply to: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Next in thread: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Reply: David Rutherford: "Re: Failure of SR (and GR)?"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
