Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality
From: Perfectly Innocent (perfectlyInnocent_at_as-if.com)
Date: 07/24/04
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Previous message: Perfectly Innocent: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- In reply to: Perfectly Innocent: "Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: 24 Jul 2004 05:01:59 -0700
Bill Hobba is a fairly intelligent and reasonably well-educated
devotee of relativity theory. Why is he so obviously confused
about superluminality?
"Bill Hobba" <bhobba@rubbish.net.au> wrote in message news:<aJXLc.12097$K53.2957@news-server.bigpond.net.au>...
>
> I have posted the proof, assuming only the lorentz transformations,
> that superluminal speeds leads to causality violations many times.
> The only out is that the lorentz transformations are not correct.
Your proof is obviously erroneous. It's perfectly consistent to
believe in the Lorentz transformation equations and superluminal
velocities if one adopts an absolute frame of reference. That's
a very respectable means of escape.
http://groups.google.com/groups?&selm=c45b45b3.0407151831.2adc9d3a@posting.google.com
Eugene Shubert
http://www.everythingimportant.org
- Next message: Uncle Al: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Previous message: Perfectly Innocent: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- In reply to: Perfectly Innocent: "Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Next in thread: Uncle Al: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|
