Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality
From: Dirk Van de moortel (dirkvandemoortel_at_ThankS-NO-SperM.hotmail.com)
Date: 07/25/04
- Next message: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Previous message: Perfectly Innocent: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- In reply to: Perfectly Innocent: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Next in thread: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Reply: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 13:40:22 GMT
"Perfectly Innocent" <perfectlyInnocent@as-if.com> wrote in message news:c45b45b3.0407250533.4d94b295@posting.google.com...
> "Curiously, when taken at the face value, all results point to
> a negative mass squared, particularly the oldest experiment."
> - John Baez.
>
> http://groups.google.com/groups?&selm=b376tc$9bc$1@glue.ucr.edu
"Curiously, when taken at the face value, all results point to
a negative mass squared, particularly the oldest experiment.
This is probably due to a systematic error, and actually two
running experiments, Mainz and Troitsk, have been able to measure
physically acceptable values."
- John Baez
Dirk Vdm
- Next message: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Previous message: Perfectly Innocent: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- In reply to: Perfectly Innocent: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Next in thread: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Reply: Robert J. Kolker: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Reply: Bilge: "Re: Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality"
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ]
Relevant Pages
|
|