Re: A question pertaining to gluons 'violating' inverse square law

From: Australopithecus Afarensis (fossil.lucy_at_cox.net)
Date: 08/24/04 

Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 23:57:47 -0700

Yes, I do find it very interesting. I have a few questions and comments as
follows.

** To equate a photon as the combination of an electron and positron is
great. That means every photon has to be accounted for. You cannot create
photons randomly out of high energy to high energy collisions. How do you
account for an atom going into its excited state by absorbing a photon? How
do you account for an excited atom going back to a lower energy state by
giving off a photon?

** To model a proton as thousands of electrons and positrons require a lot
more chance. Everything has to be perfect in a very short order of time.
When colliding two protons together with energy enough to create another
one, a third proton appears. How do you account for this?

** How do you account for the decay time of a neutron which again is made
up of thousands of electrons and positrons in your model? In that case, why
does a proton not decay in a few hundred seconds just like a neutron in your
model?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Monitek" <monitek@aol.com>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.particle
Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2004 01:58 PM
Subject: Re: A question pertaining to gluons 'violating' inverse square law

You seem to be thinking along the lines that I was thinking. So have a look
at
what I came up with and see what you think.

http://members.aol.com/medusa1989/theatom.html

Monitek (Arden Barker)

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
    ... So it's your contention that the electrons go through the slits as ... through the slits (with the detectors turned on) when human knowledge ... A *PAIR* OF ENTANGLED PHOTONS, ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: what really are Gravitons?
    ... try not to mix up a photon and a pulse of electromagnetic ... There are no fractional cycles in a standing wave. ... Electrons seem quite real, ... nor units of energy as Einstein asserted. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
    ... So it's your contention that the electrons go through the slits as ... experiment and the double slit experiment. ... experiment "without detectors" but then later cheat and peek into what ... Even a single photon "knew". ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Is a fact something that has been proven?
    ... So it's your contention that the electrons go through the slits as ... but the detectors are still "on"? ... Furthermore in a double slit experiment with single ... the behaviour of the initially undetected photon in the ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: what really are Gravitons?
    ... try not to mix up a photon and a pulse of electromagnetic ... certain is that these quanta can jiggle electrons and that said jiggling ... There are no fractional cycles in a standing wave. ... nor units of energy as Einstein asserted. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)