Re: The electron shell model is in challenge

From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 09/06/04 

Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2004 18:21:02 +0200

Y.Porat wrote:
> Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<chhaic$rjg$3@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
>
>>Y.Porat wrote:
>>
>>>Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message n
>>>
>>>
>>>>>--------------
>>
>>
>>
>>>---------------
>>>Fucken lier and idiotic croock
>>
>>I notice that you don't have any arguments left. You are really a
>>pathetic loser.
>
>
> -------------
> Hi Fertz inventor
> anyone can judge what is your real worth as a scincist

Yes. Hint: you are *still* the only one here who thinks that the idea
is ridiculous. You are *still* the only one here who says that the
idea is not worth of a scientist.

>>>>>2 i am not interested t go on with that discussion publicly
>>>>>if you like and if you will behve decently
>>>>>we can go on it privately
>>>>
>>>>Why? You don't like other people seeing how heavily you got beaten, right?
>>>>-------------------------
>>>
>>>Hi Fertz inventor (Fertzman)
>>
>>That you continue harping on this shows only time and time again that
>>you don't understand science.
>
> -------------
> incurable imbecil
> some seniour scintists told you mildly in that thread
> that you are a shamless ibbecil

No one said anything like that.

People pointed out that such a wave would be quickly damped. That
does in no way mean that it can not *exist*. A damped wave is *still*
a wave.

> and thetrefore- Goebeless

1680 points.

[snip]

>>>and a fucken nasty incurable imbecil
>>>you think that anyone on that ng can stand your gutts
>>>of a born disturbed antipat
>>>dont answer idiot it is obvious.
>>
>>Yes, it is obvious that you have no arguments left (well, you never
>>had any to start with), that you can't rebut me, that you are therefore
>>afraid of me, and hence have to resort to insults.
>
> ------------------
> anyone who folowed those last articles
> including my suggestion to discuss soeme issues privately
> and your animal response to it

What was "animal" about the response
"Why? You don't like other people seeing how heavily you got beaten, right?"

> realise that you are a little piece of human shitt
> and not worth to deal with moreover a harmful personality.
> (probably menthaly disturbed as well)

Well, then why do you keep replying to me, with posts filled with
insults? Man, you *really* must hate me!

> now piss of to your Nazi friends (m,ay be they are some of your advisors as well

1720 points.

Bye,
Bjoern