Re: The electron shell model is in challenge

From: Bjoern Feuerbacher (feuerbac_at_thphys.uni-heidelberg.de)
Date: 09/07/04 

Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2004 10:39:31 +0200

Y.Porat wrote:
> Bjoern Feuerbacher <feuerbac@thphys.uni-heidelberg.de> wrote in message news:<chi2pd$24g$5@news.urz.uni-heidelberg.de>...
>
>>Y
>>
>>
>>>
>>>-------------
>>>Hi Fertz inventor
>>>anyone can judge what is your real worth as a scincist
>>
>>Yes. Hint: you are *still* the only one here who thinks that the idea
>>is ridiculous. You are *still* the only one here who says that the
>>idea is not worth of a scientist.

I notice that you continue to ignore this.

> ----------
> ok get the Nobel for it

Nonsense. This is a *basic* exercise in electrodynamics. Nothing
special about it.

> 2 why dont you ask even some real seniour scintists in your
> University about it ?

Because that is not necessary - I already know that they would
agree with me. Hey, this is a quite basic problem - students can
solve this already after 2 years of study!

I could as well go to a senior scientist and ask him if Newton's law
of gravitation really leads to elliptical orbits - that's equally
obvious!

> sorry
> i forgot i will never get a frank admittance from you

What should I admit?

[snip]

>>>>>Hi Fertz inventor (Fertzman)
>>>>
>>>>That you continue harping on this shows only time and time again that
>>>>you don't understand science.
>>>
>>>-------------
>>>incurable imbecil
>>>some seniour scintists told you mildly in that thread
>>>that you are a shamless ibbecil
>>
>>No one said anything like that.
>>
>>People pointed out that such a wave would be quickly damped. That
>>does in no way mean that it can not *exist*. A damped wave is *still*
>>a wave.
>
> ------------------
> not only the damping is an issue

Well, what *is* the issue?

> a mathematical idiot like you cant understand that
> *the creation of such a wave is an absurd(in reality world !!)

Why?

You keep asserting this, but beside your nonsensical assertion that
EMR is always caused by resonance, you did not provide any argument for it.

> (it is not aseries of waves it is just one(steady) cycle got it idiot??

I did never propose a "series of waves" - I do not even know what you
mean by that. And I also don't know what you mean by "one steady cycle".

>>>anyone who folowed those last articles
>>>including my suggestion to discuss soeme issues privately
>>>and your animal response to it
>>
>>What was "animal" about the response
>>"Why? You don't like other people seeing how heavily you got beaten, right?"
>>----------------
>
> i explained to you idiot that there are some issues
> that should not fall into hostile hands in some geographyic places in this
> world got it idiot??

"hostile hands"??? You *really* have quite a lot of paranoia.

> you are not interested in scince

ROTFL!!! That explains why I am working in a research institute, right?
Probably all these people here, with whom I work together, are either
to dumb to notice that I don't understand science, or they don't
understand it themselves, right?

> you are interested in personal victories!! (and revange
> and political iprovement of your personal status- thats all that is
in > your mind!!)
> a good sighn of a disturbed man and a zero persionality

Pot. Kettle. Black.

*Who* is the one here who mainly uses arguments, who provides evidence,
quotations, calculations, numbers etc., and *who* on the other hand
here is the one who mainly uses obfuscation, plain denial and insults?

Additional to paranoia, you also suffer from a severe case of
projection, I see.

> and scintist that is unable for pioneering scince

Oh, that explains why I was able to publish research papers, right?

> (now will come you 'Huoo' as an answer)
> ---------------
> got it idiot?
> --------------

Yes, I got that you are in plain denial, can't answer my arguments,
and therefore have got only insults left to throw around.

>>>realise that you are a little piece of human shitt
>>>and not worth to deal with moreover a harmful personality.
>>>(probably menthaly disturbed as well)
>>
>>Well, then why do you keep replying to me, with posts filled with
>>insults? Man, you *really* must hate me!
>
>
> i amnot sure if to hate you or pitty you(as a psychotic case)

Well, writing posts filled with insults does not indicate pity, but
hate.

> sometimes you are useful in suplying information
> and raising arguments for thinking
> sometimes you becom by a miraculous switch to an animal
> may be a split personality.may be some bad advisors -i cant know.

Pot. Kettle. Black. Yet again.

> because youi dont get of my back
> and i will not let you to make the impression of being right
> and having the last word whiloe you are just a little nasty pompous zero
> i will not let agression win not any kind of scintific terorism

Well, then why do you use so much aggression?

> the way you are sitting on my back nonstop is a sort of terrorism
> (i didnt invite you to take place in that thread

I don't need your invitation for participating in a thread. Do you want
to stop my free speech?

> if i am nothing for you than just ignore me at the first place!!

I never said that you are "nothing" for me.

> thats the usual normal human behaviour!!!
> othererwise is *disturbed behaviour*

Such as yours.

Bye,
Bjoern

Loading